According
to a Facebook post by Due Process Advocate Emeka Ugwuonye.
I have reviewed the videos I discussed in my earlier post.
I have reviewed the videos I discussed in my earlier post.
Clearly, Jane
Emoka is in the unedited videotape.
She is an avid porn actress.
It was her
idea. She told the girls that someone needed them to make that sort of video in
order to guarantee their victory in the pageantry.
So, to a large extent, it is
fair to say that the girls were not forced.
I can say that right now, because we are here to say the truth.
I can say that right now, because we are here to say the truth.
However,
they never expected that the video would be used for blackmail.
They might have
expected it to be for the purpose of the private viewing pleasure of the person
that commissioned it.
From the latest batch of videos we have reviewed,
From the latest batch of videos we have reviewed,
it is clear that Jane is
a professional pornstar with vast experience. We saw her in sex act with
Chidinma (that is the unedited version of the video that was revealed).
She was
directing it.
You saw her parting the legs of the girls to get a better camera
angle.
We saw Jane also in a sex act with a 4th girl. Again, Jane is directing
the act.
Then we saw Jane in a heterosexual scene. She is a pro.
She rides it
like a professional, with all the special gestures and effects.
Now, the bigger question is: who focused the video at Chidinma?
Now, the bigger question is: who focused the video at Chidinma?
Somebody
wanted to get Chidinma on a sex video.
Who is that? And why? Apparently,
Jane
was the person trusted to deliver the video.
Also, apparently,
Jane did the
same thing to some other girls that participated in the pageantry.
Who needed
to have these girls caught on a compromised situation such
as sex video with
fellow girls? Let us rephrase the question thus:
Who was it that felt the need to have a control over these girls?
Who was it that felt the need to have a control over these girls?
What was
this control meant for? Was it just to ensure that the girls would
not resist
sex demands from the person in control over them?
Or was it intended to subject
the girls into some sex servitude
and make it easy for the person in control to
pimp them withou
t any resistance from them?
Also, bear in mind that even if these girls had ended up being pimped to
Also, bear in mind that even if these girls had ended up being pimped to
politicians and power men, those men might not be aware of how the girls
were
delivered. All each man would know was that so and so person
sent him a
beautiful young girl for his libidinal pleasure when he visited
Anambra State.
Note also that there may not be a cabal. There may be only one or
Note also that there may not be a cabal. There may be only one or
two persons
who intended to control these girls. But whoever that is has
to be someone able
to influence the outcome of the pageantry.
Hence the connection between the
making of the video sex and the
expectation of guaranteed outcome of the
pageantry. So, the pageantry was
the bait.
The video must have been commissioned by someone capable of
The video must have been commissioned by someone capable of
delivering on
the pageantry promise. And indeed, the three girls -
Chidinma, Ada and Jane -
all won something in the set of pageantries
controlled by the Anambra
Broadcasting Service (ABS).
Our investigation is now in its final stages. We are tying up the loose ends and
Our investigation is now in its final stages. We are tying up the loose ends and
we are connecting the dots. It will be all clear soon.
Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire
NOTE: Again, we have the best investigative team in Africa. We can unravel almost any intrigue and any secret deal. Nothing can be be hidden from us for long.
Emeka Ugwuonye, Esquire
NOTE: Again, we have the best investigative team in Africa. We can unravel almost any intrigue and any secret deal. Nothing can be be hidden from us for long.
No comments:
Post a Comment